UCI does get a bit of flak because it offloads openings to the GUI as well as delegating certain responsibilities to the GUI which were traditionally managed by the engine. The GUI running the engine needs to provide all relevant data with each move. UCI is stateless in many ways, which basically means each move is calculated without keeping track of it in the engine. There are pros and cons to the UCI approach over the older XBoard engine style, but UCI arguably has made chess variants much more accessible. Virtually every modern Chess front-end program supports UCI. UCI is an open protocol, so it’s easy for basically anything to adopt without having to deal with proprietary bits or arcane licensing. It was released in November of 2000, but didn’t really take off until 2002 when it was adopted by Chessbase. UCI (Universal Chess Interface) is a protocol which allows computers to have a standardized approach to chess games. That being said, you need to understand what makes chess variants work on modern systems. I want to play a game the way I want to, not fight the computer to not annoy me with sounds and questionable engines. Some of what we cover is specific to Linux systems, but the theory applies to virtually all OSes. While Windows had easier alternatives, most of them were lacking in many ways (or expensive). Just trying to play chess that wasn’t international chess proved difficult with Linux. Sometimes you want to lose to learn, but getting stomped by the highest level computer as a beginner doesn’t help. A hard computer can work as motivation or kill your dream depending on your goal and purpose for playing. Some engines are smart, while others are weak. To play chess on most computers, you need both a front-end and an engine (though some software packages both together). Like with standard chess, different engines are like different players and some offer options or strategies others don’t. I also wanted more flexibility with what and how I played. There are online systems to play, but there’s something about taking everything offline that still appeals to me. Trying to play Xiangqi took me down a rabbit hole for working with chess systems on Linux. A rook may be weak in one variant while the most important piece in another. Some variants have minor changes, while others feel just vaguely like a form of chess. It’s a fun game because it has a fixed set of rules but a massive number of possibilities. Chess has been a popular game for ages and has a multitude of variant games.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |